View Single Post
Old 08-24-2010, 09:20 PM   #21
NoDOHC
The quest for more torque
 
NoDOHC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sheboygan, Wisconsin
Posts: 855
Rep Power: 17
NoDOHC will become famous soon enough
The reason that I went with an Innovate the second time, rather than buying another AEM (which has been a good product) was the ability to calibrate and the corresponding accuracy.

The Innovate gives the opportunity to calibrate the wideband frequently in free air to compensate for the long-term degradation in the actual wideband sensor.

The AEM wideband (which can't be re-calibrated) can be off by up to 0.5 AFR after years of use, which could mean death to a closely-tuned turbo car. I think this is the reason that many people do not like them.

At the same time, on an NA car the AEM is fine because if you shoot for 13.2:1 by the wideband, you are probably reasonably close to peak power (error range of 12.7:1 to 13.7:1, which all makes good power). Running a NA engine lean of 13.4:1 (peak power) won't hurt it, you will just lose power (no valves to burn or pistons to melt).
__________________
1986 GXL ('87 4-port NA - Haltech E8, LS2 Coils. Defined Autoworks Headers, Dual 2.5" Exhaust (Dual Superflow, dBX mufflers)
1991 Coupe (KYB AGX Shocks, Eibach lowering springs, RB exhaust, Stock and Automatic)
NoDOHC is offline   Reply With Quote