Quote:
Originally Posted by RETed
At idle, it does drop the pulsewidths just about 10%, which coincides with your mileage #'s.
When trying negative split at high vacuum, low load cruising driving, the engine is "unstable" - it's almost like lean surge but slightly different resonance...
Building and tuning an RX-7 to pump out 400hp and getting 25mpg is a perfectly fine compromise in my book.
I have a daily driver other than the RX-7 for fuel economy - that's how I solve the gas mileage issue.
-Ted
|
during one of the Rx8 recalls, we got to go drive em around with the laptop hooked up. the IDC/ dealership laptop does logs like the haltech e8/e11's. so i got a chance to go drive an Rx8 and watch what it the timing did.
compared to our "normal" haltech maps, Mazda runs more advance at low rpm cruise (36BTDC L @2500 in 6th, which is like 35mph), but hit the gas, and it'll go to negative numbers, so WOT @2500rpm is like -5BTDC L, this is a taller peak than i'm used to.
decel is where it starts negative split, take your foot off the gas, and the leading timing is -5 BTDC L, and the trailing will stay high and go down with rpm.
at idle leading is almost always -5 BTDC L, and the trailing actually moves around, so it can be like 5-15 BTDC. the trailing stays more advanced than the leading until maybe 1200rpm, or if you give it any throttle whatsoever. ANY load, and the negative split is gone.
WOT over 6k its running 30BTDC L and 15 BTDC T
the second part, i also agree, 25mpg is pretty good for a heavy car like the FC. to substantially improve it, the car needs to be lighter, smaller tires etc etc. the fundamentals of the car matter a lot for mileage, my 58 Tr3 gets nearly 30mpg, and it has nothing on it that could be considered technology, but its a 2000lbs car, with skinny tires, and a decently tuned small displacement low revving engine.
i had pauls Rx8 for months, and the BEST tank of gas was like 21 or something, with 19ish being average, the FC beats that. Rx8 = 3200lbs with 225's
-mike