Rotary Car Club - View Single Post

Monkman33 · 06-05-2011, 06:33 PM

The key thing here is that people are arguing different things. "taxation displacement" has nothing to do with the actual definitive displacement of an engine. And determining displacement by the argument of "every rotor face/cylinder needs to fire" is faulty at best. For this to be even remotely true, then you would have to calculate 2 stroke and 4 stroke displacements differently. The fact of the matter is: This just doesn't happen. So these imaginary figures based on taxation methods or requiring every cylinder or rotor face to fire are just that. Imaginary figures that do not take into account he constant of 1rpm. Without this constant, there is no mathematical consistency, and then the game becomes fault riddled.

Displacement is universal to all engines as the displaced volume from 1 crankshaft/eshaft/centershaft revolution. 2 stroke or 4 stroke or rotary does not change this.

06-05-2011, 06:33 PM	#40
Monkman33 Still Building my FD Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Pasco, WA Posts: 255 Rep Power: 17	The key thing here is that people are arguing different things. "taxation displacement" has nothing to do with the actual definitive displacement of an engine. And determining displacement by the argument of "every rotor face/cylinder needs to fire" is faulty at best. For this to be even remotely true, then you would have to calculate 2 stroke and 4 stroke displacements differently. The fact of the matter is: This just doesn't happen. So these imaginary figures based on taxation methods or requiring every cylinder or rotor face to fire are just that. Imaginary figures that do not take into account he constant of 1rpm. Without this constant, there is no mathematical consistency, and then the game becomes fault riddled. Displacement is universal to all engines as the displaced volume from 1 crankshaft/eshaft/centershaft revolution. 2 stroke or 4 stroke or rotary does not change this. __________________ Uh.... hi.