03-19-2016, 06:49 PM
|
#26
|
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Slidell, LA
Posts: 191
Rep Power: 18
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninesixtwo
Aiming for a certain peak chamber pressure vs a given crank angle is fine in theory as most people don't have access to in-cylinder pressure monitoring so its kind of a moot point. In practice, OEM level calibration involves monitoring the crank angle at which 50% of the combustion charge has been consumed. The optimal point for CA50 has a 2-3 degree range for any engine, whereas peak cylinder pressure can be deemed "optimal" for a range more than twice that.
|
ninesixtwo,
Actually that is the approach that I have been working on. The TFX program also does Fraction Burn and Combustion Rate.
Anything that we can do to increase burn rate is beneficial....
One thing that can be done without internal mods (hint) for instance would be experimenting with ignition split and it's effect on burn rate.
The saw tooth angle of burning gases and the fraction burn shown below have been used to make definite increases.
Barry
|
|
|