|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
KTEC
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 642
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
im sure thats what other auto makers thought in 92. right before the 787 destroyed them and outlawed the motor...
not arguing. just stating an opinion.
__________________
what I have: 1985 Gs:12a All motor Drag car - 1973 Rx2: Play car What I had: 93 Touring: TRADED - 91 Coupe: TRADED - 90 GTU: RHD - 88 10AE: SOLD - 87 Base: SOLD - 86 Base: SOLD - 1985 GSLSE - 85 Gsl: SOLD - 80 Gs: TRADED - 1972 Rx2 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
787?
Are you talking about the LeMans winning vehicle? What does that have to do with the RX-8 MSP engine? IIRC, the 787 used a 4-rotor, PP engine. So, I really don't understand your point. If you think your MSP engine will outdo anything PP (even the older 13B PP exhaust), then I think you're smoking crack. Please do your research first - SAE is a good start. http://www.sae.org/ The advantages of the PP port over a side port is thoroughly documented. The only benefit the MSP has over a PP is the minimizing of the (port timing) overlap. Less overlap means for better emissions. Don't let the 200+ quoted hp ratings fool you. It's more due to the higher redline. Keep in mind, at BP motor with the "older" PP exhaust will produce the same if not better numbers than the MSP. -Ted |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Boricua!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 99
Rep Power: 17 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
That intake system does a lot to add to the power output. -Ted |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
KTEC
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 642
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
and the redlibe has nothing to do with the power output directly. they red line is just where it makes consistent power to. you could rev all day to 15k, but if your not making power there, whats the point? and yes, a BP or PP will put out higher numbers. but no exstensive porting has been put into the renesis yet. again, give it time. also, how reliable and how streetable is a large BP or PP? or even a small semi-PP? these motors are making in stock form almost what those make. this is my point. stop being negative. no ones trying to argue here. and i have put a 12a, 13b/gslse, TII,13b NA, and FD front cover on the renesis. all work just fine. only one hole dosnt line up. wich is an easy fix. try it out and you'll see what i mean. and i already stated that a custom oil pan will be needed given the renesis is longer. read the statement right below what you quoted. jeeze... maybe i shoud not of posted this here. just trying to put it out there. cause theres so many people asking about this. but no ones done it... why do all the internet guru's nit pick. isnt this why people hate rx7club? and come to places like this
__________________
what I have: 1985 Gs:12a All motor Drag car - 1973 Rx2: Play car What I had: 93 Touring: TRADED - 91 Coupe: TRADED - 90 GTU: RHD - 88 10AE: SOLD - 87 Base: SOLD - 86 Base: SOLD - 1985 GSLSE - 85 Gsl: SOLD - 80 Gs: TRADED - 1972 Rx2 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Sigh.....
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 2,377
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
1986 Sport: 132k miles, 5A (Sapphire Blue Metallic), Tokico Blues, Racing Beat Springs, Custom LED tailights (only S4 LED tails in the world), SSR Mark II, Racing Beat exhaust, S5 black interior, Rotary Resurrection rebuild at 120k miles Community Service Manual RotorWiki "Imagination costs nothing; we could build square locomotives or fly to Mars" - Felix Wankel Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present." |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
FUCK the fucking fuckers
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: THE only Bay Area, Northern California
Posts: 3,172
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Quote:
What's the next step in your FC3R project?
__________________
Quote:
![]() Last edited by Phoenix7; 01-16-2009 at 09:42 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
No need to mess with all this normally aspirated bullshit. Quote:
This is an open forum. As much as you get to express your opinions, I do too...as long as we don't break the rules. I did not agree with something you said in this thread, so I typed a reply and cited my references. A lot of the numbers being thrown around are a bit...twisted. The only thing that does matter is WHEN you finish this project and then throw up a dyno sheet. This is why I HATE project threads that are not completed - there's too many of them, and people get really unrealistic claims of what their cars MIGHT do. Like I said before, I'd like to see this project FINISHED; it will prove or disprove what I've been saying for a long time now. -Ted |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|