|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
Respecognize!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Δx = ħ/2Δp
Posts: 3,190
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
well consider that it is a giant chunk of metal. The standard issue piston ones are made with thinner wall, smaller diameter metal. There is a lot more strength to be found in the FC one. Odds are it wont last forever since eventually it will crack, but the same holds true with the cast iron ones, even OEM.
I am tempted to try one, header wrap and see how long the bastard goes for.
__________________
For current updates and event coverage check out Follow on Twitter! @WhizbangRally Whizbang Rally's Webpage | Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
FUCK the fucking fuckers
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: THE only Bay Area, Northern California
Posts: 3,172
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
ok, so the options are out there for t04 turbos, when it comes to manifolds. What about manifold for hybrids?
1. I'd like to know how restrictive the stock TII manifolds are. 2. How much improvement in the exhaust flow can you create? 3. Isn't the Stock manifold the most direct way from the exhaust-to-turbo?
__________________
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Give me some time bro. I'll be gettin' stuff done here in a few months, i'll keep the community posted on what I'll have available in the line up then. Also why not just get a stock manifold flow benched? Should be pretty easy to do. Go to the shop and say, hey: flow bench this for me. Tell me what it can do.
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Respecognize!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Δx = ħ/2Δp
Posts: 3,190
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
well alot of it would be a function of porting with the stock turbo to maximize flow. A stock manifold CAN make a lot of power with a large hybrid, but at what point is it too much "work" to achieve a result.
i would love to get some BNR input as well as Kevin on this one since they have opposite viewpoints.
__________________
For current updates and event coverage check out Follow on Twitter! @WhizbangRally Whizbang Rally's Webpage | Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
RCC Loves Me Not You
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
However, you forget that a majority of the magic for a turbo to operate effectively comes from temperature and pressure differences and not necessarily the flow of gases to the turbine.
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Wahts the point of flow with a stock manifold? The stock hotside is too small to give good spool on a larger turbo, that's why hybrids suck, at least imo.
__________________
My car blows up everytime I start it, it's rotary ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 | |
FUCK the fucking fuckers
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: THE only Bay Area, Northern California
Posts: 3,172
Rep Power: 21 ![]() |
Well it also depends on your goals. If I want 300hp to 350hp then the hybrid is fine. can't you port the manifold and hotside for better flow? (mind you I have never pulled the manifold out.)
__________________
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
Respecognize!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Δx = ħ/2Δp
Posts: 3,190
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
there is also the thought of new vs. used. There seem to be a lot more used T4 items around, but the end price is about that of a BNR rebuild hybrid.
__________________
For current updates and event coverage check out Follow on Twitter! @WhizbangRally Whizbang Rally's Webpage | Facebook |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
RCC Loves Me Not You
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Influx.
Posts: 2,113
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
That's a tough question because depending on how you port it you'll gain velocity but reduce pressure. The rest is up to the turbine wheel and what's being used with what.
__________________
The Official FC Radiator Thread My Project Thread: Cerberus CCVT Virginia Rotary Group |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
My manifold is ported as well as the entry to the hotside. I can't tell a big difference, but it does seem to spool faster. In fact it spools faster than FerociousP's 6 port turbo.
As far as manifold solutions go, I have a tubular T04 designed for an FD. I am going to use an RB header flange as a spacer to clear the LIM, then go from there. Although I am very tempted to build myself a hybrid. I am not looking for super high HP anyway.
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
so if you use two gaskets and an rb flange you can space a fd manifold out far enough to clear? Same for the 13b-re intake manifolds? Are the stock studs long enough?
__________________
My car blows up everytime I start it, it's rotary ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
From what I have read, yes it will clear TII and RE LIM's. One of the two styles of turbochargers (tangial or on-center, can't remember which) will usually clear with no spacer. I'll have to look it up again though.
The stock studs are NOT long enough. You need to get longer ones, which can be found at many online hardware sites.
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
What thread, pitche and length stud should be ordered?
__________________
My car blows up everytime I start it, it's rotary ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Rotary Fanatic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 302
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Hola.
Cast iron HKS manifolds are great for 400-450 RWHP applications and you don't have to worry about cracking issues. The T2 cast iron manifolds have creep issues if the turbine housing is small. Also the pattern maker of the 2g hks manifold didn't account for casting shrinkage and the ports don't line up with the engine ports. If the 2g is port matched, you are good if you run a .96 A/r T4 turbine housing. The .81 undivided will creep a bit. The FD HKS cast is fully devided and the 1.00 a/r divided turbine housing is about the best combo. With the right external gate, creep will not be seen. The china manifold is fine, not great on quality, but if it cracks, it only costs 100 bucks to replace it ![]() ![]() Bryan@BNR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
The reason why cast turbo exhaust manifolds are recommended is because they will outlast almost any tube turbo exhaust manifolds.
If you're going to argue stainless steel tube turbo exhaust manifolds, then cast units will almost always be cheaper. Except for all that Made-in-China crap... There's an underlying problem with buying all that cheap ass Made-in-China crap... Economies. People bitch about how the US dollar is devalued and how China's economy is pumping like there's no tomorrow. Gee...I wonder why...duh. You wanna save your dollars now and bend the U.S. economy over, go buy all that cheap crap. Sorry for the global economy rant. -Ted |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|