|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
If you're getting paid $7 / hour, it's illegal, unless it's a commission and / or tips earning position. BTW, Hawaii might not be the poorest area, but it's the most expensive to live in. A gallon of milk breaks $7. Gasoline on the neighbor islands have already broken $4 / gallon. A loaf of bread is $3. Hawaii has the highest COLA index in the nation - 26%? Back to the topic... Acceleration wise, I doubt most will feel the difference. The complaints about the 3.9 rear is mostly due to the combination of the 3.9 rear *and* the automatic trans. You cannot get a 3.9 rear with a manual trans from the factory. If you have a very sensitive butt dyno, you might feel the acceleration difference. Is that what you're looking for? Really, there is no significant, positive reason to go with a 3.9 rear with a stockish 13B... -Ted |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Senior Member/Lounge Rat
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Corbin, KY
Posts: 296
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
And yes, that was exactly what I was looking for. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|