|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Lifetime Rotorhead
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 874
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Answers:
1. Both of those lines with the worm gear clamps are fuel. One of them (forget which - consult FSM or just follow the hose to figure it out) connects to the outlet of the fuel filter, and sees high pressure from the pump. The other is the return fuel line back to the tank. Get rid of those crappy worm gear clamps ASAP and get the proper clamps for fuel injection plumbing - the spring OEM type or the T-bolt style band clamps that are rated for this. Ditto for the hose - you'll also want to check the hose to verify that it is rated for high pressure fuel injection systems, not the cheaper fuel line hose that you can use on carb cars. 2. No, but that 3rd open nipple is for fuel vapors. Per the FSM, for a S5 turbo this one routes back to the charcoal canister. 3. I really can't tell from the picture, but on my S5 T2, that 3rd open nipple (discussed in #2 above) connects to a hose, which routes to another hardline nipple on the firewall, and that hardline routes across the FW to near the charcoal canister, where it connects to the canister with another hose. 4. Nope, just fuel vapors. 5. There are 2 nipples on the canister - you'll need to consult the FSM to determine which one goes where, but one of the nipples on the canister goes as discussed in #2 & 3, the other line goes back to the fuel tank, via hose & hard line. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
rotors excite me
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
He isn't a killer. He just wins -- thoroughly. ![]() ![]() '87 TII 240+ rwhp on my DIY streetport, ~13psi on stock turbo, Racing Beat REVTII exhaust ![]() rTek 2.1 awaits a tune Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
RCC Addict
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii USA
Posts: 1,813
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
(see 1st / left pic below) Since these clamps are pretty small and the threads on the screw / bolt are pretty small, they are very easy to overtighten. Once you overtighten, the clamp is damaged and no good. Once the clamp is damaged, it will loosen and cause a fuel leak. If you know what you are doing and torque them properly, yes, they are superior versus the typical "worm gear pipe clamps" (see 2nd / right pic below) These worm gear pipe clamps are more resistant to overtightening and are superior than the above when overtightened - at least they will not back off and loosen. (I've had a customer of mine go through this headache a few weeks ago - "t-bolt" clamp leaked [most likely overtightened] and replaced with small "worm drive" pipe clamps.) If all of that scares you, use the stock-type spring clamps. I'd recommend to double them up though - that will guarantee it will not leak. Notice that the stock spring clamps use on the fuel system (if you got the originals) are thicker and "double walled" than the other clamps used on the emissions system plumbing. Quote:
(SAE) 30R7 / J30R7 - this is NOT what you want: http://www.discounthydraulichose.com.../30r7-hose.htm (SAE) 30R9 / J30R9 - this is the fuel injection rated stuff you want: http://www.goodyearep.com/ProductsDetail.aspx?id=5144 The key is the "7" versus "9" in the SAE code #. I've seen 30R7 with printed "RATED TO 150PSI" on the hose that failed on fuel injection applications. Ignore the "RATED TO" # - this doesn't mean squat in our case. (Notice the "Minimum Burst Pressure" rating of "250 psi" in the first link.) Steady state pressure does not cause the (30R7) hose to fail - it's the pulsation from fuel injection systems that does the damage. 30R7 is not designed to handle the pulsations and pressure fluctuations due to the fuel injectors firing rapidly. -Ted |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|