|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Bah!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside, SoCal
Posts: 442
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Unless you can find a way to retain all the thermal energy contained in the exhaust, you'll lose it as heat through the ultra-long manifold leading to the remote-mounted turbo. Not a very efficient design IMO.
__________________
Johnson TA FC in the works! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Sigh.....
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 2,377
Rep Power: 20 ![]() |
Hmmm. If it's going to be run from the bin area then I would think you could insulate the intercooler piping with the exhaust piping somehow.
__________________
1986 Sport: 132k miles, 5A (Sapphire Blue Metallic), Tokico Blues, Racing Beat Springs, Custom LED tailights (only S4 LED tails in the world), SSR Mark II, Racing Beat exhaust, S5 black interior, Rotary Resurrection rebuild at 120k miles Community Service Manual RotorWiki "Imagination costs nothing; we could build square locomotives or fly to Mars" - Felix Wankel Yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Big Daddy
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 419
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I realize the design isn't as efficient as an underhood mounted turbo, but what I'm looking for is a way to add a turbo to an NA without all the underhood work required. I'm not looking to make huge power, I'm looking to run 5 -7 pounds of boost to give the car more pep.
__________________
Hell hath no fury like a rotor blown. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Bah!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Riverside, SoCal
Posts: 442
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
Johnson TA FC in the works! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|