A follow up to "Help!!!"

[Nicole]

I had a compression check done back last year and they said it was low, which meant it needed to be replaced eventually. The problem is that it is running terrific - when it runs, and I keep getting varying opinions from different people that just because the compression is low it doesnt mean I have to get a new engine. Which just doesn't sound right to me. Low compression = replace the engine. At least that is what I thought. Im uploading a copy of the paperwork from the dealer that did the compression check.

[RETed]

The receipt does state that it's "low," but it doesn't mention any numbers...
That's kinda lame.
I find it hard to believe that a ~100k engine is already in need of replacement?!?
Maybe this is just a totally difference beast than a 2nd gen non-turbo...

I am, too, working on a customer's '04 model, and I have to agree what others have already mentioned...
Fix as much things as cheaply as you can and...dump the car.
I know at least these first year model have a lot of headaches.
It's going to take a combination of a lot of money, time, and a competent mechanic to address all of it.
Is that worth it to you?
i don't think so if it entails a $5k replacement engine...

If you REALLY love the car, then by all means keep it...
But from an economical point of view, it isn't.


-Ted