|
RX-7 2nd Gen Specific (1986-92) RX-7 1986-92 Discussion including performance modifications and technical support sections. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
Alright, but all things being equal, I can hang with any combination of suspension on the Dragon.
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Pirate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central IL
Posts: 1,323
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
That just means you might be a decent driver and can use the car better than a lesser driver with better suspension. Tires also play a big part in it, some Toyos will make any relic handle like it's new again, while a guy with stiff suspension and worn out all seasons wont be as fast.
__________________
Rotaries:They are NOT that complicated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
rotors excite me
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I'm not real familiar with the AAS, but I'm pretty sure the ECU has nothing to do with it. There might be a wiring diagram in the FSM.
__________________
He isn't a killer. He just wins -- thoroughly. ![]() ![]() '87 TII 240+ rwhp on my DIY streetport, ~13psi on stock turbo, Racing Beat REVTII exhaust ![]() rTek 2.1 awaits a tune Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
The ECU could care less if it is there or not. Just unplug the AAS motors at the top of the struts, if you want you can trace the harness back and remove all the wiring completely.
The switch just unplugs under the console and pops out. You can find consoles without the AAS and just swap out that piece. There is no dummy light or anything that will come on when removed.
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
IT'S ALIVE!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 811
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Oops, by ECU I meant the control system for the AAS (I've heard people refer to the switches/motherboard as the ECU such as the horn ECU, wiper ECU, etc). I always thought the RX-7's systems were modular being OBDI. Either way, definitely easier to work with than my old Protege in which every mod required a resistor or something to trick the ECU.
But yeah, I'd probably just remove all the wiring and the switch just for completeness' sake. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blue Blur
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Posts: 211
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
I would help you out on the switch delete, but I have to keep it for my FC
![]()
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Pirate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central IL
Posts: 1,323
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
omp does not have anything to do with the emissions, even S5 electrical ones will work fine with no emissions. You can keep the BAC no problem, in fact it's recommended, as well as the thermowax on the throttle body.
If you have an N/A, you can open the ports w/o the air pump. Check up Kevin Landers' write up. As far as modding a 20yo, that's just the point, it's a 20yo car, not a Ferrari, so why treat it like one? My car is fine, but it's hardly perfect, however I'm not disheartened by that, because I would rather sacrifice some little insignificant thing like a switch for better handling. Or a bit of low end torque for top end power. You'd be crazy not to... After all, modding a car is all about sacrificing one thing for another.
__________________
Rotaries:They are NOT that complicated! Last edited by Max777; 01-24-2010 at 09:39 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blue Blur
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Posts: 211
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
rotors excite me
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 372
Rep Power: 18 ![]() |
I eliminated emissions for a few reasons:
1) More vacuum lines, solenoids, and other crap to break and therefore diagnose and fix. 2) It looks like shit. There's a reason it's called the rat's nest. 3) Weight. The lines and solenoids don't weigh much, but the ACV, air pump, and air pump intake probably make up ~15lbs. 4) It further familiarized me with the car, its systems and how they were originally made to work, and then how I can improve or improvise on that.
__________________
He isn't a killer. He just wins -- thoroughly. ![]() ![]() '87 TII 240+ rwhp on my DIY streetport, ~13psi on stock turbo, Racing Beat REVTII exhaust ![]() rTek 2.1 awaits a tune Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
IT'S ALIVE!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 811
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
^^^ I can see why someone would want to do that. This car, however, is going to be DD so the ACV, air pump, OMP, BAC, thermowax, 6PI and related components will be retained. If I can remove some/all emissions equipment and retain those then great, otherwise everything will be staying in.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | ||
Pirate
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Central IL
Posts: 1,323
Rep Power: 19 ![]() |
Quote:
The car drives fine w/o them, you can keep the other components like the OMP, the BAC, and warm up pellet, and remove the rest like I already said. I dont understand how "being a daily driver" has anything to do with keeping that stuff, cause it BARELY affects drivability.... Quote:
Emissions removal also makes it a lot easier and less of a hassle to pull the top intake off if you need to have access to the injectors or wiring harness.
__________________
Rotaries:They are NOT that complicated! Last edited by Max777; 01-25-2010 at 04:53 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
IT'S ALIVE!
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 811
Rep Power: 16 ![]() |
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blue Blur
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Windsor
Posts: 211
Rep Power: 0 ![]() |
Quote:
![]() I was just proving that instead of going through all the work of taking apart half my engine and buying 40-50 dollars in block of plates and caps, and lose bottom end by wiring open my ports, i spent 6 bucks and an hour of my time to get low/top end torque and still keep my engine intact. I plan for the future. Now my 10th ann im going to ditch it all. I plan to run that to the ground... Im also tired of all my friends ditching broken components of there cars, ghetto rigging the engine to run without them then using the "i took it off for weight reduction excuse" If i can have an average 150-200 pound friend ride with me and not notice to much performance loss, i dont see the need to ditch 30 pounds of crap, unless im gutting the interior too. And power steering, and ac, and heat, and my radio...... Its all or nothin man. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
My minds tellin' me no...
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
Posts: 4,043
Rep Power: 22 ![]() |
This thread has gone off topic.......big time.
__________________
1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 1976 Mazda Cosmo RX-5 2003 Toyota Tundra TRD 2015 Toyota 4Runner SR5 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|